by Tom » Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:29 pm
Hi ZZ,
Well I do know for certain the last thing PPL was doing when this was put together was trying to fit into a genre. Fuller doesn't write that way today, doesn't work that way today, and never did. He puts out what he feels good about, what he thinks is reflective of him, and touches on the variety of skills he brings to the table. That's how Bustin' Out happened. Much the same can be said for Reilly, who spared no time and great expense to get this together and put out what he too, felt was vintage PPL, ala Fuller. These guys had no delusions of grandeur, no thoughts like " Let's put these on it, leave out that, blend into the crap that passes for country today, and make a killing." In fact, Fuller was quoted as the exact opposite. That's exactly why PPL passed up many offers to record in the past, preferring instead to do things their way. I think that's why we got such an honest and terrific piece of work, one which is in the proudest of PPL traditions: pedal steel, fiddle, mandolin, mixed in with both acoustic and electric guitars, tight driving drums, all wrapped around what I think is one of the greatest singer/songwriters of my time. .Of course Fuller, Reilly, and the rest of PPL do listen to fan feedback, and that is a fact directly from them, but they always remain true to themselves too. And this effort was no different than the 70's and 80's. Ar least 4 of these tunes were played on a regular basis throughout their last tour and a 5th was added in late in the tour. They received very positive feedback, so they are on it, whether or not they fit a genre never entered into the equation. That of course, is how they always worked, they were always a word of mouth band, living on the road and giving fans what apparently pleased them. Nothing new there.
Personally, I think all the marks and traditions of a great PPL LP are still very much there: strong vocals, both lead and harmonies, very tight musicianship and extremly strong songwriting. I think LIDog made a very good point in his remarks, that" this CD sounds different than any other PPL record, another trademark of PPL". I also feel there is quite a bit of diversity in song styles. PPL said right from the start they were returning to their basic roots, no horns or sax, but pedal steel , a countrified flavor etc. That's what we got. They said arrangements would be sparse , they would rely on their musical abilities, what they did in a studio was what you would get, there would be no additions like most of today's bands do who cannot make their studio work a viable product like PPL can and need to have various things layered in to produce what their vocals and instruments can't.
I find plenty of variety in the LP, but that's me. I listen to songs like Cajun Girl, That Changes Everything, Don't Go Confessin' Your Love then hear on the other end of the spectrum tunes like The Cost Of Living, I Sure Do Miss You Now, which, to me, are completely different in nature any way you slice it. Not to mention they hardly sound like songs which are going out of their way to find their way into today's country music scene.Those few examples for me, are diverse enough. In between you have a song like Nothing Like The Lonely, which again, is a strong contrast in style to anything I just mentioned. Some tunes I just mentioned are clearly uptempo in nature ( you can add Gettin' Over You to that) while others mid tempo and some flat out slow almost ballad type music. I think looking at a Two Lane Highway and Merle being on the same LP and I'll Be Damned and Let Me Love You Tonight as you stated, is no different than looking at Cajun Girl , That Changes Everything and If You Say What I'm Thinking being on the same CD as The Cost Of Doing Business and I Sure Do Miss You Now. That for me is variety, a sharp contrast in styles both musically and vocally.That's PPL. And if PPL was to come back and return to their basics, who better than Craig Fuller to do it !!
I agree with Jim that many of these tunes could easily be big seller's in today's market, but that also was true of every PPL lineup in the past. Another observation from LIDog that I found interesting was " They've created a great cd that will fit in well in both country and classic rock circles, which has always been the trademark of PPL's best records." I have to agree with that one. I also feel this CD has widespread appeal agewise. Obviously it's a different scenario now as PPL did this themselves, no high priced machine pushing it into the market, no one telling them when and where to play. They did this for fun, they had a spot in their lives where they had the time and knew PPL fans still had an interest. Not to say they wouldn't like to make a few bucks off their efforts either !! But they are relying on their music and their fans to make it happen and no one else.
ZZ , please do not think these remarks are intended to be critical of yours, they are not as I do understand and appreciate your comments as I also loved those tunes and lineups you mentioned, not to mention the concerts--I'm glad I'm still breathing. In fact, I was lucky enough to see them do Love Is An Illusion in concert shortly after it was written and it was great ! Thank you for taking the time to come here and post them !! More than anything I am using this post to give the many new fans who have joined this site in the last 2 months a little background info on how PPL came about recording again, why they passed up on offers from record companies, what their thoughts and ideas were about reforming and what direction they would take, and what they were thinking going into the studio.
Thanks again for signing up on the board and I hope we hear more from you, there are many topics here that I think you will get a kick out of and feel free to start some more new ones too.
All the best,
Tom